Radical Hot-Take on AI
Veo makes a moment in my handmade journal come to life. I make the art and the photograph with my sensibilities, and AI takes me higher in under a minute.
Did not see this coming. Or I did. I've seen this pattern before, anyway.I'm of sufficient age to have lived through the Digital Revolution in the early 1990s. I was an old-school graphic designer in New York when the consumer Macintosh hit the field hard. I went from pasting up waxed galleys of linotype output onto cyan-blue layout grids to Photoshop v.2 image editing and Quark page layouts overnight.
Back then, the designers and graphic artists were shitting their pants over the new Digital Tools and what they would mean to their business. Oh, how the dinosaurs roared over how inferior the digital results were to their hand-inked logos or what-have-you. I once had a nasty phone call with one of these hand-inkers who was asking me to pay him double to revise one of his babies per the client's requests. He said he'd need to be paid double because he'd have to start over from scratch to change the logo's color and size.
I let him know that his world was over, that the new digital tools, like Adobe Illustrator at the time, were making infinite client revisions in mere moments. His methods were an instant anachronism, gone the way of the buggy whip.
I bought my first Mac system around then, after one of my publishing colleagues said it would pay for itself in two months. He was right. That was over thirty years ago, and I see the same pattern happening now with AI.
There is much hand-wringing and vitriol towards AI and its ramifications for humanity and culture. It's wrong, they shout, it's evil, as they hand-paint their "NO AI" t-shirts with blood-red paint.
Not at all.
AI is powerful, more powerful than any other tool ever given to humanity in history thus far. Many atrocities will be committed with it by people with misguided intentions. Its ability to convincingly create realities is as terrifying as the atom bomb, no doubt.
But AI is in no way negative in and of itself. It is nothing more than a set of revolutionary expansions of digital tools. Artists are getting their mitts on to it, as slowly happened in design and photography 30 years ago, and they are creating (yes, creating) art more phenomenal than any human ever has. It is Super Human, with vast new frontiers opening into what can and will be done with it.
AI is not "Artificial Intelligence"; it is "Augmented Intelligence." It assists the genuine artist in making their art with as much nuance, meaning, and beauty as a mortal human ever has. This is a brand new day for humanity, honestly. A new day of Greater Powers.
That clip is a thing of beauty. You hand made every element and the only augmented bit is the movement. AI in your capable hands and caring spirit, I love what you're doing.
ReplyDelete~Yuji
Thank you, Yuji! THANK YOU! Stand by for how this kind of approach is affecting Halfland for the better. I spend each day in conversation with Gemini on how to make the best use of Veo to animate with keener aesthetic integrity. I'm about to go shoot a couple puppets from various angles as part of my "Multi-image conditioning" for Veo's "Internal Training Data" education. Is AI the animator I've been waiting for?? Perhaps!
DeleteOne more point, how can AI be part of what I love about Halfland?! The appeal of creative stop-motion in 1992's Nightmare Before Christmas is what made me want to realize the folktale in my mind as a handmade stop-motion film in the first place. Nothing would make me angrier than when later stop-motion films were painstakingly built only to end up looking indistinguishable from CGI. So, why now am I experimenting with AI? Because. It's. That. Good. The clips Veo and I have been making just a few days in have all the handmade flaws and textures of what I've made, even the movements are exactly as I'd hoped to shoot them myself. Only far better than I could in decades. I can shoot frame by frame if I see anything lacking with this approach. The Veo clips would be incredible as storyboarding, if not perfect for the final work. Stay tuned. I may be able to share results soon!
DeleteIt sounds like you are a step closer to your vision - how exciting.
ReplyDeleteAre you concerned about platforms using AI detection algorithms to police content?
https://www.cartoonbrew.com/shorts/tiny-grandma-youtube-marie-hart-peter-heacock-260502.html
jill
Hi, Jill. Great point. I'll read the linked article to be sure, but in general, I'm all in on Google at this point.I intend to stay within the Google infrastructure only, no third-party apps or farmed sandboxes. I have reasonable hesitations, of course. Not so much for persecution over what I create. More like wanting authentic Google server computation rather than an outside platform using my original art to train their own less powerful internal AI models, allowing my work to show up in someone else's generated content.
Delete…Ah, I see what you were saying. No, I have zero concern over what YouTube or any platform polices Halfland to be. Chiefly, because I'm not monetizing it. Problem solved. But also because I'm only using platforms like YouTube to post clips to and to share them in this one blogspot on the web. I plan to use pepper's ghost to run updatable SD card projections of the final clips inside a large glass bottle. Those can be made available to art collections, if they like. Otherwise, the whole thing gets shared freely here.
DeletePeople taking the content and posting it as their own is an unstoppable factor. All the legal measures in the world couldn't prevent it or shut it down. But I know what I'm making and why. Number one, it's the most fun. and number two, I believe, at its best, it's medicine. Someone can steal or lift what I've made, but they can't make the magic in it work. That's mine to ensure.
Part of the ugly transition to this new way of collaborating with AI, is to have difficulty seeing AI assistance as AI content. It isn't from my pov. It's synergistic, neither me nor AI can make Halfland alone.